- Click incident for information                                                     ICPEM news RSS feed logo       RSS feeds  RSS feed logo

24 May 2013
 
  HomeAward of Excellence
   

   
  AGM and Annual Report  

Members can download copies of the 2011/2012 Annual Report here.

Annual Report 2011/2012

Members can download papers for the 2013 Annual General Meeting here

2012 Annual Award of Excellence


At the ICPEM Conference held on 3 May 2012, the annual Award of Excellence was awarded to Roger Young, FICPEM

Roger was nominated by Peter Simpson and seconded by Tony Moore.

Peter’s nomination stated:

Since 2004, Roger has been the project lead in discharging UK government strategy within its foreign policy for international counter terrorism and emergency management programmes through Cranfield University. I and other ICPEM members have worked with Roger since 2004 on international capability assessments and training projects in countries including Indonesia, Philippines, Kenya, Egypt, Malaysia and other countries. His international diplomacy, professional experience and academic knowledge coupled with impressive training skills has meant he is highly respected both personally and professionally within the international CT and emergency management community.

In the last 8yrs Roger has worked tirelessly to promote UK crisis and emergency management capability, Cranfield University Resilience Centre and the work of ICPEM to friendly governments and international partners. I have owe much of my personal and professional development to Roger and hope the panel will recognise his achievement.

 

Introduction

 

In 2003, Cranfield University were awarded a contract by the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) to run its Counter Terrorism programme in targeted countries overseas. The work is funded through the FCO Strategic Programme Fund for Countering Terrorism and Radicalisation (CTR) (http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/about-us/publications-and-documents/publications1/annual-reports/strat-prog-fund1) which aims to enhance the counter terrorism capabilities and to strengthen the resilience of key foreign Government based on the 4 key strands set out in the UK’s counter terrorism strategy CONTEST.

 

Roger Young’s role in the programme

Realising that this was likely to be a full-time commitment, Cranfield University advertised for a manager to run the programme. A number of people applied but at the interviews it quickly became apparent that Roger Young, a former Chief Superintendent in the Thames Valley Police Service, was the best candidate. He therefore took up the post in October 2004. The original programme featured four countries, Indonesia, Kenya, Malaysia and the Philippines. Egypt was subsequently added. All have been subjected to terrorist attacks. In fact for much of the time, Indonesia and the Philippines had ongoing problems with internal terrorist groups.

The programmes have principally been aimed at incident commanders from the first responding agencies, plus support organisations such as the intelligence agencies, business and Non-Governmental Organisations. The aim of the programmes have been to develop their knowledge, skills and understanding of good incident management, including the need for proper planning and organised, effective response and to impress upon them the need for realistic multi-agency exercises. In order to do this, Roger has had to identify and use subject specific experts depending on the nature of the programme and its content. This has entailed the bringing together of individuals and moulding them into teams for the duration of the course.

The fact that, despite strong opposition from those who would like to be running this programme, Cranfield University has now been responsible for it for 7½ years, is due in no small part to Roger’s personality, enthusiasm and dedication, which has been recognised by those working at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London, and the high esteem that those working in the diplomatic missions of the countries concerned hold him.

What people have said about Roger

Two of those who have worked with Roger on this programme have written about him. The first writes:

“Roger is an excellent team player and has strong capabilities as a teacher. He has excellent listening skills and a quick analytical brain. His sense of loyalty is strong and properly placed. He has a ‘fun’ side that enhances his work and develops others when he interacts with them as a leader, teacher, friend or colleague.”

The second writes:

“I have had the privilege to work with Roger on a range of international projects since 2006 in his role as Programme Manager. During that time I have found Roger to be the consummate professional. He is an intelligent and energetic individual, who has brought considerable policy and academic insight to our work. He has excellent diplomatic, organisational and diverse team-building skills, which are vital to the success of overseas projects. He is a highly conscientious individual who pays particular attention to both client and staff needs making him an excellent leader and manager. Roger can cope with highly complex and sensitive issues and has always delivered, whatever the circumstances.”

Clearly Roger’s nomination met the Aim and Objectives of the Institute:

a) promoting public safety and protecting the lives of not only the people who reside in the countries in which the programme has been run for the last seven or so years but also all people visiting those countries.

b) encouraging various bodies in the countries that the programme has been run to study the response to terrorist incidents worldwide and, indeed, other civil emergencies, in order to identify lessons as to how best to respond to such incidents;

c) constantly pressing those countries to adopt the highest possible standards of professional practice.

d) supporting the FCO in promoting the development of emergency management internationally, albeit under a slightly different name.

 

 

In addition, whilst the programme is primarily aimed at incident commanders, i.e. at Gold and Silver level, at the same time he has been encouraging, within the countries concerned, the education and training of those lower down the organisation, in terms of the skills they need to ensure an effective response.

 


 

Previous recipients have been:

  • 2005 Steve Gregory
  • 2006 Muriel McLenahan OBE
  • 2007 Dr Anne Eyre
  • 2008 Tony Thompson
  • 2009 Not awarded
  • 2010 Bill Blake and Tony Moore
  • 2011 Dr. Peter Jefferson and Dr. Walter J Ammann

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ICPEM Annual Award of Excellence


The Award of Excellence was donated by Peter Davies, at the time, Secretary of the Institute of Emergency Management.

Peter is still a member of the ICPEM,

As Peter lives in Wales it was designed in conjunction with  the manufacturer and produced and engraved by Welsh Royal Crystal located at Rhayader. 

The prize sum which accompanies the Award has been carried through since the IEM and the ICDDS merged and is funded by the Institute.

ICPEM Annual Award of Excellence - Nominations
   The closing date for nominations for  
  the 2013 award is 14th April  

  
The ICPEM Annual Award of Excellence
The ICPEM annual award has been established in order to recognise significant contributions in the field of emergency management. 
 
The intention of the Committee in giving this award is to provide formal recognition of activities undertaken which are in keeping with the aims and objectives of the Institute and also to encourage further activities in fulfillment of these.
 
Guidelines/Rules for the Award
 
The Executive Council of the ICPEM shall act as Awards Committee and shall consider nominations for the award on an annual basis
 
Nominations for the award may be based on contributions to the field in various forms, including research activity/publications, programme and policy advancement and/or professional development of the field. The form of contribution is deliberately non-prescriptive in recognition of the fact that contributions to this field may vary while still meeting the broad intentions of the award.
  
In order to be considered for an award a nominee's work must be evidenced through a written nomination (see attached nomination form: Appendix A).
  •  Nominators and nominees need not be members of the Institute.
  •  The awards committee will itself generate nominations as well as obtaining them in whatever way it deems feasible from the broader emergency management community
  • Anyone wishing to be considered as a nominee themselves must be supported by a formal nominator
  • Members of the Awards Committee may not be considered for the Award during their time of office
  • A nominee considered one year but not given the award is eligible in future years
  • There will be no more than one award a year. 
  • While possible nominees are to be considered every year, no award need be made if the Committee decide that none of the nominations in any given year meet the established criteria  
Criteria for Evaluating Nominations
 
A nomination will be considered eligible for this award on the basis of the extent to which the awards committee is satisfied that it meets the following criteria:
 
1. The nominee presents a clear statement supporting the view that that the work of the nominee fulfils the aims and objectives of the IPCEM in part or full. These are:
 
2. To promote public safety and to protect the lives and property of citizens of the world by:
  •  Promoting study and research into the causes and effects of disasters and civil emergencies; and how best to respond to such incidents; and publicising the useful results of such research; and
  •  Promoting education and training of members of emergency services, other responders, and the public, in the skills to deal with such emergencies
  •  Pressing for the highest possible standards of professional practice.
  •  Promoting the development of emergency management internationally as a profession.
  •  Supporting, encouraging and assisting in the development of vocational and academic courses of professional studies and research at under- and post graduate levels.
  •  Facilitating the interchange of ideas regarding the theory and practice of emergency management and the communication and publication ofinformation on such subjects of interest to members and the profession.
  •  Representing the views of its members to governments and other responsible bodies.

3. The nomination includes appropriate references/evidence in support of the statement.

4. The nominee is not a member of the Awards Committee.

Presentation of the Award
 
Details of the winner will be announced at the Annual Conference and presented with a prize consisting of a year's free membership of the Institute (if a member) and the Welsh Crystal Trophy.
 
The decision of the Awards Committee shall be final. Any matter not set out in these principles, such as the specifics of the criteria used in making the award, are left to the discretion of the AwardsCommittee.
 
Download the nomination form here

Privacy Statement | Terms Of Use Copyright 2008-12 ICPEM - The ICPEM is a UK Registered Charity, No. 1127226